Novak Djokovic is being deported.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

It is because the ruling from the minister Hawke was lawful.
He has that power even though it's unfair.

You and I have lost a lot due to this pandemic.
Novak wants to ignore our laws and lie - deport him.

I took the AstraZeneca vaccine - 3 shots now but I fully understand
why other people would chose not to.
Notice I didn't take an mRNA vaccine!
I can't see how a Govt. can force people to take an experimental vaccine
which has serious side effects and even death for some people.
That is not fair.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you.
How is an mRNA vaccine developed recently any more experimental than an viral vector vaccine developed recently

What is wrong with you?
The Adenovirus in the AstraZeneca vaccine is technology that has been around for 40 years.
It has been used in many flu vaccines and the outcomes are well known.
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer -
we don't know the long term consequences of them.
It's not in the MSM - it's been censored -
but there are 10s of 1000s of horrific injuries caused by mRNA vaccines.

They were both new vaccines regardless of the background in technology. As a results they are both as experimental as the other. Also mRNA vaccines have not only been around for a 1 year, the first mRNA vaccines iun humans were tested in 2013. and they had developed and administered mRNA vaccines in Ebola since then.

But we better get used to them Bobby, mRNA vaccines are the future since any machine that synthesises the mRNA can do that for any mRNA strand we want.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

That is NOT why he was deported.

Never use facts with anti-vaxxer dickheads.

[Bobby]

You and I have lost a lot due to this pandemic.
Novak wants to ignore our laws and lie - deport him.

I took the AstraZeneca vaccine - 3 shots now but I fully understand
why other people would chose not to.
Notice I didn't take an mRNA vaccine!
I can't see how a Govt. can force people to take an experimental vaccine
which has serious side effects and even death for some people.
That is not fair.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you.
How is an mRNA vaccine developed recently any more experimental than an viral vector vaccine developed recently

What is wrong with you?
The Adenovirus in the AstraZeneca vaccine is technology that has been around for 40 years.
It has been used in many flu vaccines and the outcomes are well known.
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer -
we don't know the long term consequences of them.
It's not in the MSM - it's been censored -
but there are 10s of 1000s of horrific injuries caused by mRNA vaccines.

They were both new vaccines regardless of the background in technology. As a results they are both as experimental as the other. Also mRNA vaccines have not only been around for a 1 year, the first mRNA vaccines iun humans were tested in 2013. and they had developed and administered mRNA vaccines in Ebola since then.

But we better get used to them Bobby, mRNA vaccines are the future since any machine that synthesises the mRNA can do that for any mRNA strand we want.

mRNA technology was invented as a cure for cancer to target cancer cells.
It was only used as a vaccine for a virus in the last 2 years.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

I took the AstraZeneca vaccine - 3 shots now but I fully understand
why other people would chose not to.
Notice I didn't take an mRNA vaccine!
I can't see how a Govt. can force people to take an experimental vaccine
which has serious side effects and even death for some people.
That is not fair.

Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you.
How is an mRNA vaccine developed recently any more experimental than an viral vector vaccine developed recently

What is wrong with you?
The Adenovirus in the AstraZeneca vaccine is technology that has been around for 40 years.
It has been used in many flu vaccines and the outcomes are well known.
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer -
we don't know the long term consequences of them.
It's not in the MSM - it's been censored -
but there are 10s of 1000s of horrific injuries caused by mRNA vaccines.

They were both new vaccines regardless of the background in technology. As a results they are both as experimental as the other. Also mRNA vaccines have not only been around for a 1 year, the first mRNA vaccines iun humans were tested in 2013. and they had developed and administered mRNA vaccines in Ebola since then.

But we better get used to them Bobby, mRNA vaccines are the future since any machine that synthesises the mRNA can do that for any mRNA strand we want.

mRNA technology was invented as a cure for cancer to target cancer cells.
It was only used as a vaccine for a virus in the last 2 years.

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

https://www.reuters.com/lifestyle/sport ... ce=twitter


Wonder if this has anything to do with him not getting vaxxed

The pandemic has blocked Novak Djokovic's march to tennis history, so the 34-year-old may be pinning his hopes on a cure for COVID to get his hands on another glorious grand slam before time runs out.

The Serbian superstar, who became a focus of the global vaccine debate over his failed attempt to enter Australia without being inoculated, holds a majority stake in a Danish biotech firm aiming to develop a treatment to counter COVID-19, the company's CEO told Reuters.

[Bobby]

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?

[Bobby]

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?

First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.

[Prime Minister for Canyons]

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?

First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.

First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?

[Bobby]

You said 1 year, make up your mind. Plus the cure for cancer is fine, since the technology is essentially the same. Introducing mRNA into a cell, which then translates into a protein which in cancer might kill the cell or in the case of a vaccine produces a antigen for immune response. Thats the cool thing about the mRNA technology. Its cool science.

I said -
mRNA vaccines have only been around for 1 year or a bit longer.
They were still testing them 2 years ago.

Therefore we have only at the most 2 years of data about mRNA Covid vaccines but
40 years of data for Adenovirus type vaccines such as AstraZeneca.

mRNA is not proven in the long term as being safe to use.
The Govt. has lied to you.

Lipid nanoparticles have been used for many years on different products, DOXIL has been in use since 1995. Human trials of mRNA vaccines have been since 2011.

They have been proven, you're just an idiot.

But lets go on that, how do you think they are not safe? What mechanism involving the technology do you think is unsafe?

First I ever heard of that after 1000s of hours of reading about it.

First you've heard of lipid nanoparticles being used in cancer treatments in 1995?

No -
first I've heard of an mRNA vaccine from 2011.
Are you bullshitting?