Global Warming

[IQS.RLOW]

IQ, what other options do we have to get the right behaviours in humanity to reduce significantly the root caue of our warming other than taxation?

Adaptation (which includes R&D) is the only solution. Individualism coupled to countries that will self-protect will ensure that there will never, ever be a global consensus to mitigate a non-existent problem with the most expensive insurance policy the world have ever seen.

The jury is out on climate sensitivity, so no one (except stupid leftists like the GALP) will commit to the most expensive insurance policy that the world has ever seen because only leftist have no problem with wasting other people money on useless initiatives.

[Super Nova]

IQ, what other options do we have to get the right behaviours in humanity to reduce significantly the root caue of our warming other than taxation?

Adaptation (which includes R&D) is the only solution. Individualism coupled to countries that will self-protect will ensure that there will never, ever be a global consensus to mitigate a non-existent problem with the most expensive insurance policy the world have ever seen.

The jury is out on climate sensitivity, so no one (except stupid leftists like the GALP) will commit to the most expensive insurance policy that the world has ever seen because only leftist have no problem with wasting other people money on useless initiatives.

How does the natural environment adapt. Do we just let the world die as we move to live in dome cities?

[IQS.RLOW]

Your panic merchantism is cute, but unsaleable.

[Super Nova]

Your panic merchantism is cute, but unsaleable.

Your misunderstanding of the difference between and insurance policy and the management of a risk/issue is laughable.

Today we have a risk.

Tomorrow we will have an issue that needs to be addressed.

[Rorschach]

IQ, what other options do we have to get the right behaviours in humanity to reduce significantly the root caue of our warming other than taxation?

Adaptation (which includes R&D) is the only solution. Individualism coupled to countries that will self-protect will ensure that there will never, ever be a global consensus to mitigate a non-existent problem with the most expensive insurance policy the world have ever seen.

The jury is out on climate sensitivity, so no one (except stupid leftists like the GALP) will commit to the most expensive insurance policy that the world has ever seen because only leftist have no problem with wasting other people money on useless initiatives.

How does the natural environment adapt. Do we just let the world die as we move to live in dome cities?

The world isn't dying.... it's been hotter/colder/more humid, etc, etc, etc.... before.... and it had nothing to do with man.

[IQS.RLOW]

Your panic merchantism is cute, but unsaleable.

Your misunderstanding of the difference between and insurance policy and the management of a risk/issue is laughable.

Today we have a risk.

Tomorrow we will have an issue that needs to be addressed.

Your misunderstanding of 'risk' is the issue, hence your bedwetting panic merchantism that has no basis in reality or data.

[boxy]

Temperatures of -15C (with wind chill) in Winter is pretty normal here.

Where in Australia are -15C temperatures "pretty normal"?

[Chard]

you are denying Pielkes data set.

I did no such thing, you lying sack of uneducated white trash.

I said People's "societal changes" model only accounts for a single aspect of increased severe weather and does not account for others. Learn to read, you stupid motherfucker.

[IQS.RLOW]

I did no such thing, you lying sack of uneducated white trash.

Ooohhhhh darky is a bit of a racist

I see you still didn't read the full Pielke paper then. Why do you keep making an idiot of yourself, 'republican'

[IQS.RLOW]

Let me help a lower down the rung, jutting browed, humanoid out here... (At least you've managed to keep yourself out of jail, which is quite a feat for your type in the US and sub continental Africa- although in Africa you would be able to devolve into your more natural state with less repercussion than the US...but kudos to you for rising above your base monkey like reactions like many of your brethren)

The bottom line is that, with no long-term trend identified in normalized hurricane dam- age over the twentieth century (in the United States or elsewhere; see ref. 8, for example), it is exceedingly unlikely that scientists will iden- tify large changes in historical storm behav- iour that have significant societal implications.