Radical Labor Policies

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
Serial Brain 9
Posts: 863
Joined: Mon Dec 24, 2018 8:09 pm

Radical Labor Policies

Post by Serial Brain 9 » Fri Apr 26, 2019 8:12 am

Hands off our children you Sick Bastards. :evil:
School children who identify as transgender could undergo unnecessary sex changes under radical Labor policies, doctor warns

Labor's proposed gender policy could result in unnecessary sex changes among young school children, doctors have warned.

The party's national platform has included a clause on gender identity and sexual orientation, including the creation of a National Gender Centre and even appointing a Commissioner for Sexual Orientation and Gender Identity.

The policy aims to make 'gender affirming technology' more affordable and accessible as well as adding more gender identification options on birth certificates.

The document states it should 'materialise in a focus on creating fair, equal and affordable access to medical care and treatments relevant to trans and gender-diverse Australians.'

ut medical professionals and critics have warned the policies could be detrimental to children and result in unintended consequences, according to the Daily Telegraph.

Dr John Whitehall, a professor of paediatrics at Western Sydney University called the policy 'pernicious,' for promoting a concept which is still unproven, he told the publication.

The procedures, he claims, have real effects on patients - including 'castration' - based on a theory that is still being scientifically debated.

According to the most recent census in 2016, about 1,260 people identify as transgender in Australia.

The doctor also said the Government's involvement with the issue could potentially see medical professionals being punished for refusing to go through with these procedures.

'This party of the working-class has promised to permit no other option for any of its gender-confused children,' Dr Whitehall said.

'The politicians should leave gender-confused children to family and child psychologists and psychiatrists.'

Conservative politicians have also criticised the policy saying it can interfere with parents' control over their children and how they are raised.

Sydney barrister Sophie York warned that children can be 'susceptible' to the indoctrination, she told the Telegraph.

Earlier this month, Tasmania became the first Australian jurisdiction to make gender optional on birth certificates after landmark legislation passed.

The legislation allows 16-year-olds to change their registered gender via a statutory declaration without permission of their parents.

The laws also remove the requirement for transgender people to have sexual reassignment surgery in order to have their new gender recognised.

Prime Minister Scott Morrison last year labelled the push to remove gender from birth certificates as 'ridiculous'.

In October last year, Labor leader Bill Shorten said there were no plans to introduce new gender options on passports and birth certificates.

'The platform talks about making sure all Australians are treated equally,' he told Daily Mail Australia at the time.

'Labor has no plans to remove gender from official documents.'

A Labor spokesperson called the remarks 'ridiculous' and part of the Liberals' 'scare campaign.'

'Nothing in our National Platform forces parents or children to do anything. Labor's focus, as always, is on the best interests of children,' the spokesman said.
Who on earth would vote for these demented morons. ?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/articl ... 2xdBSZdqx0
And we know that for those who love God all things work together for good, for those who are called according to his purpose.

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 19289
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Radical Labor Policies

Post by Bobby » Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:35 am

Since poofter marriage passed in the vote -

the halfwits in this country would vote for anything.

User avatar
billy the kid
Posts: 5814
Joined: Fri Mar 29, 2019 4:54 pm

Re: Radical Labor Policies

Post by billy the kid » Fri Apr 26, 2019 10:39 am

Heres another one....
Labour is talking about passing legislation to give part time employees the right to seek fulltime employment
after 12 months casual work with the same employer.
Well, bill, they have that right now....
But Shithead shorten is saying if the boss unreasonably refuses the request for a full time position the employee
could challenge that.
Well, if I was the boss, I would ask a bloke after ten months if he wanted a full time job, and if he said yes, I would
let him go and tell him there wasnt enough work for him to be kept on...
Shithead shorten must think people are stupid to believe this absolute crap...
Absolute garbage policy from another moronic politician who is showing daily that he is way way way out of his depth....
And at the same time he is advocating for higher wages for everyone..
Sinking in his own shit......
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...

User avatar
Bobby
Posts: 19289
Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm

Re: Radical Labor Policies

Post by Bobby » Fri Apr 26, 2019 12:11 pm

Billy,
Well get Shorten because that's all we deserve.

User avatar
brian ross
Posts: 6059
Joined: Thu Apr 19, 2018 6:26 pm

Re: Radical Labor Policies

Post by brian ross » Fri Apr 26, 2019 2:04 pm

Image

Oh, dearie, dearie, me. More Homophobia it seems. Tsk, tsk, such silly children you lot are. Run along, back to the little kiddies' playground where you lot belong. :roll:
Nationalism is not to be confused with patriotism. - Eric Blair

User avatar
Outlaw Yogi
Posts: 2404
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2012 9:27 pm

Re: Radical Labor Policies

Post by Outlaw Yogi » Sat May 04, 2019 3:27 pm

Hardly surprising .... as kids in Victoria must be gay to go to school and the only reason to join the army these days is for the free sex change.

About a year and a half ago or so ... within a couple of months of Turncoat's poo-jabber marriage plebiscite, on a hot Saturday afternoon I was tired and grumpy after work (don't usually have to work Saturdays) and was looking for a shaded parking spot as I had Fred (my red dog) in the cab of the ute. I went into Gin Gin IGA car park and there was one shady spot left, so I lined the ute up to back in and as I was backing in some arsewipe in a small red Nissan 4WD darts in nose first cutting me off.

I got out of my ute, walked up to his open driver's window and said "I've got a dog in the car, I had that spot lined up and was backing in and you stole it". The fat bearded Nissan driver looked at me and smiled as if to say "Ha, fuck you!". I said "If you don't move I'll ram yer" (had attached 5" X 3" box section made of 6mm thick steel to rear of my ute).
The queer in the Nissan effeminately declared "Oh don't ram me, don't ram me" and moved.

I took my spot and went in to do my shopping, half expecting an encounter in IGA.
I put my shopping in my ute and realised I'd forgotten smokes (yes I'm smoking again) so went back in.
When I got back to my ute I rolled and lit a smoke while standing beside it, when the faggy Nissan driver pulled up in front of me and asked "Do you normally ram people?"
I replied "Only arseholes".
He declared "I'm not an arsehole, I apologised".
I said "Apology accepted then".
He continued "And you were going to ram me".
I replied "Yeah, I was".
He blabbered "You need to do some prison time".
I replied "I've already done that".
He quizzed "Oh I can believe that, what did you do? ... ram someone else?"
I asked "Do you want to find out?"
He quipped "Do you?"
So I countered with "Well get out of your car and show me then".
It took off with a little tyre chirpy.

I finished my smoke and while leaving the car park a cop car entered.
When I got onto the main street/HWY I saw is red Nissan parked opposite the cop shop.

I meant to but never did post this recount with the declaration; "See what happens? ... you let 'em get married and they think they're a protected species".
If Donald Trump is so close to the Ruskis, why couldn't he get Vladimir Putin to put novichok in Xi Jjinping's lipstick?

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests