Gay marriage conscience vote
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
- mantra
- Posts: 9132
- Joined: Wed Jun 02, 2010 9:45 am
Gay marriage conscience vote
Gay marriage is back on the agenda in Australia thanks to a recent affirmative conscience vote and will become a reality in the near future, but is this really fair?
Shouldn't we have had a referendum on this as it is a minority demand? Most people have gotten past gay unions and would probably agree that civil unions are fine, but are the majority ready for gay marriage to become legal in Australia. Funnily enough Kevin Rudd's sister has quit the Labor Party in disgust, yet Andrew Bolt's sister has embraced this vote because she is already married to another woman.
Today we have Penny Wong, our Finance Minister, proudly showing off her new baby girl which her partner conceived through artificial insemination and although the birth is wonderful, children today are growing up in unisex homes where bisexuality and homosexuality is considered normal, but is it really normal? Over the next few decades will our society consist of genderless human beings who won't be distinguishable as either male or female and will future generations become more reliant on artificial insemination as a means of conception?
Shouldn't we have had a referendum on this as it is a minority demand? Most people have gotten past gay unions and would probably agree that civil unions are fine, but are the majority ready for gay marriage to become legal in Australia. Funnily enough Kevin Rudd's sister has quit the Labor Party in disgust, yet Andrew Bolt's sister has embraced this vote because she is already married to another woman.
Today we have Penny Wong, our Finance Minister, proudly showing off her new baby girl which her partner conceived through artificial insemination and although the birth is wonderful, children today are growing up in unisex homes where bisexuality and homosexuality is considered normal, but is it really normal? Over the next few decades will our society consist of genderless human beings who won't be distinguishable as either male or female and will future generations become more reliant on artificial insemination as a means of conception?
-
- Posts: 11347
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
My conscience tells me allowing same sex marriage is a mistake.
I'm with Andrew Bolt on this one.. 100%!!
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... is_reform/
Not all gays are pro-gay marriage.
A good friend of mine is staunchly opposed to it for the same reasons Bolts mate gives in the link above.
Where do we draw the line?
I'm with Andrew Bolt on this one.. 100%!!
http://blogs.news.com.au/heraldsun/andr ... is_reform/
Not all gays are pro-gay marriage.
A good friend of mine is staunchly opposed to it for the same reasons Bolts mate gives in the link above.
Where do we draw the line?
-
- Posts: 11347
- Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Why not take it to referendum and permit all Australians their conscience vote?
Because they know they'd lose. Likewise with their carbon-tax.
An overwhelming majority of Australians oppose gay marriage.

Because they know they'd lose. Likewise with their carbon-tax.
An overwhelming majority of Australians oppose gay marriage.

Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Smellie Mellie posts garbage again.
A majority FAVOR gay marriage, you fucking mad moron! Piss off back to your insane asylum you dribble shit!
A majority FAVOR gay marriage, you fucking mad moron! Piss off back to your insane asylum you dribble shit!
- skippy
- Posts: 5239
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
I doubt it would lose considering EVERY poll taken says the OVERWHELMING majority of Australians support it.mellie wrote:Why not take it to referendum and permit all Australians their conscience vote?
Because they know they'd lose. Likewise with their carbon-tax.
An overwhelming majority of Australians oppose gay marriage.
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Told you that she just dribbles shit, just types whatever is in her excuse of a mind at the time, no reference to facts for our lunatic!
- IQS.RLOW
- Posts: 19345
- Joined: Mon Mar 08, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Quote Aussie: nigger
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Wrong
An overwhelming majority thought that it was "inevitable" not that they support it
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/green ... 6121530691
An overwhelming majority thought that it was "inevitable" not that they support it
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/green ... 6121530691
FaggotsGAY marriage has been rejected by the majority of MPs who took part in a special parliamentary debate on the issue.
But some MPs who oppose redefining the term marriage have backed civil unions to lessen discrimination faced by same-sex couples.
The debate on gay marriage was forced by Melbourne Greens MP Adam Bandt, who wanted politicians to survey their electorates on the subject.
Some of the 30 MPs who took part in the debate attacked Mr Bandt for "distracting" from other issues such as the carbon tax and jobs.
Most MPs who took part in the debate said their electorate did not support gay marriage, while just six said that their electorate supported change.
Quote by Aussie: I was a long term dead beat, wife abusing, drunk, black Muslim, on the dole for decades prison escapee having been convicted of paedophilia
- Bart
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:51 am
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Why have a conscious vote on a self imposed lifestyle, especially when the outcome will not change one iota what those gays are going to do anyway. They want to be seen as normal yet they can't accept that they are not.
Then by having a conscious vote on gays does that mean that all the other legislation they passed was voted without a conscious.
Why no conscious vote on the carbon dioxide tax,
cause most GALP members don't believe in it that's why! 
Then by having a conscious vote on gays does that mean that all the other legislation they passed was voted without a conscious.
Why no conscious vote on the carbon dioxide tax,


Women...if they had brains they'd be men
- Bart
- Posts: 1684
- Joined: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:51 am
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
IQS.RLOW wrote:Wrong
An overwhelming majority thought that it was "inevitable" not that they support it
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/ipad/green ... 6121530691FaggotsGAY marriage has been rejected by the majority of MPs who took part in a special parliamentary debate on the issue.
But some MPs who oppose redefining the term marriage have backed civil unions to lessen discrimination faced by same-sex couples.
The debate on gay marriage was forced by Melbourne Greens MP Adam Bandt, who wanted politicians to survey their electorates on the subject.
Some of the 30 MPs who took part in the debate attacked Mr Bandt for "distracting" from other issues such as the carbon tax and jobs.
Most MPs who took part in the debate said their electorate did not support gay marriage, while just six said that their electorate supported change.
True, most Australians do NOT support the gays.

But guess the gays refuse to accept that too!





Women...if they had brains they'd be men
- skippy
- Posts: 5239
- Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 3:48 pm
Re: Gay marriage conscience vote
Of course some of the fringe dwelling extremists like mellie and IQ dont support it,but the overwhelming majority of Australians are not as simple minded as mellie. In IQs case he's just worried his boyfriend will hit him up for maintenance when they break up. 

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests