It's a good website that tells the truth that the ABC doesn't report.
https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-14/ ... /105159556
How election candidates are boosting The Noticer, a news site promoting neo-Nazi ideologies
In short:
ABC NEWS Verify has found news site The Noticer promotes white supremacist ideologies and its headlines have been shared by federal election candidates and sitting parliamentarians.
Google said it has disabled its ads on some Noticer articles, citing its policies that prohibit advertising next to content that promotes "hate speech" and "hate groups".
ABC NEWS Verify has also found Trumpet of Patriots leader Suellen Wrightson, Family First leader Lyle Shelton, and candidates from both One Nation, and the Libertarian Party, have shared the website's content.
The ABC goes after "The Noticer"
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Bobby
- Posts: 19198
- Joined: Thu Feb 23, 2017 8:09 pm
Re: The ABC goes after "The Noticer"
The ABC employs a a cheap logical fallacy:
Google AI
"Argumentum ad Hitlerum," also known as the "Hitler Card," is a logical fallacy that uses Hitler's actions and beliefs as a way to dismiss or invalidate an opposing argument. It's a form of "reductio ad Hitlerum," a tactic of guilt by association that compares someone's argument to Hitler's to discredit it. The fallacy relies on the idea that anything similar to Hitler's actions or beliefs is inherently wrong and therefore unacceptable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum
Reductio ad Hitlerum (Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's argument on the basis that the same idea was promoted or practised by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] Arguments can be termed reductio ad Hitlerum if they are fallacious (e.g., arguing that because Hitler abstained from eating meat or was against smoking, anyone else who does so is a Nazi). Contrarily, straightforward arguments critiquing specifically fascist components of Nazism like Führerprinzip are not part of the association fallacy.
Formulated by Leo Strauss in 1953, reductio ad Hitlerum takes its name from the term used in logic called reductio ad absurdum ("reduction to the absurdity").[4] According to Strauss, reductio ad Hitlerum is a type of ad hominem, ad misericordiam, or a fallacy of irrelevance. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. It is a tactic often used to derail arguments because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent.[5]
Google AI
"Argumentum ad Hitlerum," also known as the "Hitler Card," is a logical fallacy that uses Hitler's actions and beliefs as a way to dismiss or invalidate an opposing argument. It's a form of "reductio ad Hitlerum," a tactic of guilt by association that compares someone's argument to Hitler's to discredit it. The fallacy relies on the idea that anything similar to Hitler's actions or beliefs is inherently wrong and therefore unacceptable.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reductio_ad_Hitlerum
Reductio ad Hitlerum (Latin for "reduction to Hitler"), also known as playing the Nazi card,[1][2] is an attempt to invalidate someone else's argument on the basis that the same idea was promoted or practised by Adolf Hitler or the Nazi Party.[3] Arguments can be termed reductio ad Hitlerum if they are fallacious (e.g., arguing that because Hitler abstained from eating meat or was against smoking, anyone else who does so is a Nazi). Contrarily, straightforward arguments critiquing specifically fascist components of Nazism like Führerprinzip are not part of the association fallacy.
Formulated by Leo Strauss in 1953, reductio ad Hitlerum takes its name from the term used in logic called reductio ad absurdum ("reduction to the absurdity").[4] According to Strauss, reductio ad Hitlerum is a type of ad hominem, ad misericordiam, or a fallacy of irrelevance. The suggested rationale is one of guilt by association. It is a tactic often used to derail arguments because such comparisons tend to distract and anger the opponent.[5]
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 9 guests