What do you mean if? ... there is no argument/doubt disputing JM is a compulsive liar.IQS.RLOW wrote:If Monk is the liar,
Not that it qualifies or discount Aussie's integrity, or lack of, but JM is caught out constantly.
He's about as trustworthy as a fake charity collector addicted to poker machines.then he can't be put in a position of trust.
He's the sort of character who says things, then 5 minutes later denies saying it.
So with the 'precious' controls he could pick a fight and then re-edit threads to give himself victim status, for his psychotic indignation rants. Which we all know he would do.
Why the phuk bother? You know, I know, we all know, even JM himself knows, if he becomes Mod, we will have nothing but trouble, and virtually everyone will vote with their feet via abandonment en masse.Aussie wrote: Monk has made a false statement. What he said on his Site is incorrect. That in itself does not disqualify him from being in the running. I would like to hear from him here about why he made that silly remark on his site. I have seen lots of stupid, completely wrong posts made in the last week or so.....Hi Mantra........but one moment of stupidity does not take Monk out of the running.
That he made the comment is probably something he regrets, and he has the opportunity to explain the brain snap.
Who gives a rat's arse what he said? ... he babbles bullshit constantly, and the only thing he can be trusted to do is constantly bullshit.