Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Have a chat here and this is also where you start Petitions. Current election Threads will also be here. Some old election Threads are also here.
Post Reply
User avatar
tllwd
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:07 pm

Re: Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Post by tllwd » Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:48 pm

mellie wrote:
Fri Jun 06, 2025 2:14 pm
Getting back on track.....

Poor old Charles is not going to be on the throne for long, meaning his queen mistress won't have her bogus title for long either.

The true queen is Diana, and she's with God looking after children who've lost their lives due to traumatic circumstances I'll bet.

Camilla De'vile is not my Queen.

Of course Charles is bitter about this, had hoped to enjoy longevity the way both his parents did. Hence - "red"
chrlscmll.jpeg
You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

User avatar
Jasin
Posts: 2135
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:18 pm

Re: Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Post by Jasin » Fri Jun 06, 2025 4:55 pm

Good posts Mellie.

Oi! Where is your avatar piccie?🧐

Art (Visual) does incorporate all colours, but when I refer to the essence of the Industry itself, it's Red. Just as Politics is White, Medicine is Blue, Military is Green, Maths is Black, etc.
Also, Red is Aviation from the Red Baron (Ace of Aces), the Red Arrows, Chuck Yeagar's fav colour, Qantas, etc.
White is Naval and Boats.
Silver/Grey is cars/bikes (chrome)
and so on

Some I learned in Art when depicting the right dominant colours pertaining to objects and industries.
Religion and Fashion (spirituality... for nakedness is unspiritual aka garden of Eden) are Brown... hence a lot of writers, librarians and other Bookies wear a lot of brown attire.

Of course there's the virtue signal Lefty of anyone/anything can be any colour. But they say also that we are all one race (ignoring the differences) like ignoring the fact that we all don't live on a one big friendly Supercontinent. There are differences for a reason.

User avatar
Jasin
Posts: 2135
Joined: Sun Dec 03, 2017 4:18 pm

Re: Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Post by Jasin » Fri Jun 06, 2025 5:21 pm

Kings and Queens are Masters of Ceremony.
That is, Music, Entertainment, Pomp and Pageantry.
Of course, in History, many such have deemed themselves Military and Political 'rulers'.
But in essence Emperors & Empress's are the true Military highest status, hence Military Empires, rather than the Royal Kingdoms.
Politics too has its representation in Presidents.
Pharoahs for Art and Champions for Sport, etc.

I believe the United Kingdom Royals are the weakest, although most celebrity popular, Royals of Europe compared to the mainland ones. As time moves on, a lot of Euro Royals are distancing themselves from Political and Military inputs towards more Entertainment and Media connections.
Take in account the Court Jester, the mockery of Kings and Queens - a comic entertainment.
Elvis as the King, Prince of Purple Rain, Queen Latifah - all music identifying with Royalty rather than Military Emperors, Political Presidents, etc.

As for the United Kingdom Royals (for Great Britain is the political side), they will one day betray the political Great Britain side like Judaism, in favour of the ever growing mainland Europe of Music/Entertainment/Media and like Jesus (Political/Religious) - Great Britain will die upon its own Union Jack Cross in sacrifice for its colonies... to be born again, to reclaim North America in the 'new' West.
Germany (has failed), France (is failing) and Italy/Greece sacrifice their colonies/international empowerments in favour of self preservation - which sadly for them, shows their false Political/military/religious character that manifests in the negative (weakness)... like Germany turned into Nazism like a Jewish Frankenstein.

So the UK Royalty have their role. It's just not political. Hence why Charles stayed out of Politics and left it to the Prime Ministers to run.

The only thing I don't agree with in any such high status, top of the Pyramid position in anything is BLOODLINES. This is Racism at its most sublime.
A King or Queen position should be attained by Merit, Achievement, Character and all the rest. Not Class, not Caste, not Bloodline. Such results in retardations like the Hapsburgs and history has proven countless times that blood is weakest at the top of cultural privilege.

mellie
Posts: 11788
Joined: Mon Feb 28, 2011 7:52 pm

Re: Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Post by mellie » Sun Jun 22, 2025 10:56 am

Neither royals are trully unwell, Cancer, poor health, is a convenient and strategic excuse to evacuate them all to safer territory in the likelihood of WW3.


When the royals leave Westminster..... Get ready to rumble!!

:c
~A climate change denier is what an idiot calls a realist~https://g.co/kgs/6F5wtU

User avatar
tllwd
Posts: 866
Joined: Wed Nov 13, 2024 4:07 pm

Re: Portrait of Charles looks like hell.

Post by tllwd » Wed Jun 25, 2025 12:19 pm


Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests