From your survey and how many respondents were interviewed and from which states?
Regarding sense of personal safety, when respondents were asked if they were worried about becoming a victim of crime in their local area, 25% were worried in 2009, 35% in 2017.
There is, however, the possibility to develop a second interpretation of the survey and demographic data presented in this report. This second perspective indicatesthat the Australia of 2017 is less resilient than the Australia of ten years earlier, less able to deal with economic and other crises that may eventuate in coming years.
First, there is an increasing geographical concentration of the overseas‐born populations, as indicated by the census analysis reported here. This increased concentration, particularly in Sydney and Melbourne, questions whether past patterns of integration are
continuing, or whether new norms are being established those consequences need to be better understood.
Second, the relatively high level of negative feeling towards Muslims is a factor that enters into evaluation of future risk. Questions in the Life in Australia survey conducted for the Scanlon Foundation indicate that 41% of respondents are negative towards Muslims, compared to 6% towards Buddhists. Focus group discussions undertaken for the Scanlon Foundation’s Australia@2015, and other projects, indicates that this negativity is in part fed by the reality – and the heightened perception – of radical rejectionism of Australia’s secular democratic values and institutions within segments of the Muslim population, which in 2016 was the largest of the non‐Christian faith groups.
Third, a closer examination of the ten years of Scanlon Foundation surveys indicate a potential weakness of interpretation based on aggregated data, in which the two levels of positive (‘strongly agree’ and ‘disagree’) or negative (‘strongly disagree’ and ‘disagree’) response are treated as one. The risk is that deteriorating results at the ‘strongly’ held level may be masked by such
aggregation
Whilst PAST immigration HAS made a positive contribution to Australia the masses we are now bringing in from 3rd world countries and who are changing the fabric of society in Sydney especially, your 85% is fractured and the latest polls show that the majority of Australians want immigration CUT.
A majority (61%) said they believed that “overall” immigration had made a positive contribution to Australian society but a majority (55%) also agreed with the statement immigration should be slowed as it causes too much change to our society.
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-n ... ntial-poll
It found that 74 per cent thought Australia did not need more people, with big majorities believing that population growth was putting “a lot of pressure” on hospitals, roads, affordable housing and jobs.
Fifty-four per cent wanted a cut to migration, while 55 per cent agreed Australia “was in danger of losing its culture and identity”, and 52 per cent said the country had changed so much that it sometimes felt foreign.
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/victor ... c2425f25bf