Position of Moderator

[boxy]

Fuck me but you are thick, “Lisa.”

The proper term is intellectually disabled

[Aussie]

If Monk is the liar, then he can't be put in a position of trust. If Aussie is the liar then this thread is completely useless as he has already promised it to Monk

So is Monk or Aussie the liar. This should be of interest to everybody before anyone moves forward with moderator ideas

Seems logical. If monk isn't made a mod, then he was the liar... if he is appointed, it's Aussie that lied

Monk has made a false statement. What he said on his Site is incorrect. That in itself does not disqualify him from being in the running. I would like to hear from him here about why he made that silly remark on his site. I have seen lots of stupid, completely wrong posts made in the last week or so.....Hi Mantra........but one moment of stupidity does not take Monk out of the running.

That he made the comment is probably something he regrets, and he has the opportunity to explain the brain snap.

[Lisa]

Fuck me but you are thick, “Lisa.”

The proper term is intellectually disabled

and the proper term for you is gullible!

[lisa jones]

Fuck me but you are thick, “Lisa.”

Monk, it's our resident troll and clone .. what more would you expect from IT?

IT is MORE than just thick .. IT is seriously mentally ill.

[Lisa]

Fuck me but you are thick, “Lisa.”

Monk, it's our resident troll and clone .. what more would you expect from IT?

IT is MORE than just thick .. IT is seriously mentally ill.

and yet you impersonate me, even arrived after me


and as said before no female would post the whore trash that you post - you ARE a male!

[lisa jones]

I've been thinking about this idea for a few days now ..

I don't believe it's ever been tried before on PA.

And I think it falls in line with Aussie's Policy Platform and direction to reform this forum and make it fairer and more inclusive.

Ok, here goes ..

It would be awesome if those who have been nominated or put forward for Mod and who would like to offer their time to do so were given the opportunity to TRY the role for 3 months within the context of THIS forum.

I believe this will benefit:

* the individual who takes on the role of Mod because it will encourage more forum posters to come forward and give it a go. As the commitment isn't for a whole year, it will allow for different people ( males/females/newbies/oldies/lefties/righties) to try their hand at the role and provide each individual with forum Mod training and experience.

* the Forum as a whole because we will be able to sample the different modes of modding .. given that each individual will bring their personality and past experiences into the role.

I believe that this structure provides for a win-win outcome.

Those Mods who are elected by Admin to cover the 3 month terms should be announced at the beginning of a new Admin's tenure ( in effect creating a time table to cover the 12 months ahead ).

Which thus brings us to this ^^^

So .. in essence .. we have 4 people who are being considered for Mod atm.

And the proposed changes I am suggesting would nicely allow for all 4 members to mod the forum over the course of the next 12 months.

OI! YOU LOT!!!! Pssst!!!

Monk and Skippy and IQ and Outlaw Yogi have been put forward for consideration.

All 4 can be given a term of 3 months to cover the 12 month period.

Done???

Yes???

[Rainbow Moonlight]

I think anyone Aussie appoints should be appointed on a trail basis initially to see how they handle it and what happens. I think they should have well about a three week trial, followed by 3 months probation, extended to six months thereafter and possibly renewable. I don't think there is any harm in leaving Boxy as a mod while trial and probation takes place. But that is if aussie can work with him and he enforces aussie's policy.

[Lisa]

does that mean nominations ar eshut becaus eof my clone

[Jovial Monk]

My main motivation was change. It was that all the way through. It still is. Most of Aussie’s program is based on stuff I have talked of for a while now. He made some last minute additions, remember? My work.

[boxy]

Monk has made a false statement. What he said on his Site is incorrect. That in itself does not disqualify him from being in the running. I would like to hear from him here about why he made that silly remark on his site. I have seen lots of stupid, completely wrong posts made in the last week or so.....Hi Mantra........but one moment of stupidity does not take Monk out of the running.

That he made the comment is probably something he regrets, and he has the opportunity to explain the brain snap.

Come off it, Aussie. He makes a habit of deliberately lying when it suits him, and you know it.

But I guess you like that. It's much easier to control, by playing off their "brain snaps" against those of your own.