....has the bloody (whatever) to be critical of the physical appearance of Kate.
What a bitch?
Forum rules
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
It's such a fine line between stupid and clever. Random guest posting.
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11793
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: What a bitch?
All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.British novelist Hilary Mantel has slammed the Duchess of Cambridge, calling the future Queen of England a "shop-window mannequin" with no personality, whose only purpose is to breed.
Mantel criticised Prince William's wife for appearing "gloss-varnished," labeling her a "machine-made" princess, who was "designed by committee" with a "plastic smile," contrasting the Duchess to Prince William's mother, Diana, "whose human awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed in her every gesture."
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: What a bitch?
I'm just wondering if your latest choices of topic titles are deliberate attempts to make the site look bad Aussie?
Surely not...
"What a bitch"
"Pissy"
etc...

Surely not...
"What a bitch"
"Pissy"
etc...

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
- Neferti
- Posts: 18113
- Joined: Wed Jan 12, 2011 3:26 pm
Re: What a bitch?
Charles is the next in line. Until his mother dies ..........Super Nova wrote:All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.British novelist Hilary Mantel has slammed the Duchess of Cambridge, calling the future Queen of England a "shop-window mannequin" with no personality, whose only purpose is to breed.
Mantel criticised Prince William's wife for appearing "gloss-varnished," labeling her a "machine-made" princess, who was "designed by committee" with a "plastic smile," contrasting the Duchess to Prince William's mother, Diana, "whose human awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed in her every gesture."
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
Whatever Kate and Billy have begat, who cares? I doubt I will be alive when we have King Bill and Queen Kate.
Re: What a bitch?
Yes, I am sure Kate is doing her job. But, my point was a tad different. If I was a fat bitch life loser like her, the last person I'd be critical of would be someone who obviously has regard for their physical well-being and appearance......unless of course I was also an attention seeking fat bitch life loser using their miserable profile to attack the taller poppy.All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11793
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: What a bitch?
I think Charles would be brand damaging. They need to skip him and go straight to Billy Boy and Kate.Neferti~ wrote:Charles is the next in line. Until his mother dies ..........Super Nova wrote:All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.British novelist Hilary Mantel has slammed the Duchess of Cambridge, calling the future Queen of England a "shop-window mannequin" with no personality, whose only purpose is to breed.
Mantel criticised Prince William's wife for appearing "gloss-varnished," labeling her a "machine-made" princess, who was "designed by committee" with a "plastic smile," contrasting the Duchess to Prince William's mother, Diana, "whose human awkwardness and emotional incontinence showed in her every gesture."
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
Whatever Kate and Billy have begat, who cares? I doubt I will be alive when we have King Bill and Queen Kate.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
Re: What a bitch?
Good to see that you get your priorities right.Rorschach wrote:I'm just wondering if your latest choices of topic titles are deliberate attempts to make the site look bad Aussie?![]()
Surely not...
"What a bitch"
"Pissy"
etc...
- Super Nova
- Posts: 11793
- Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 12:49 am
- Location: Overseas
Re: What a bitch?
Arhhh now I see. I ignored the man to play the ball.Aussie wrote:Yes, I am sure Kate is doing her job. But, my point was a tad different. If I was a fat bitch life loser like her, the last person I'd be critical of would be someone who obviously has regard for their physical well-being and appearance......unless of course I was also an attention seeking fat bitch life loser using their miserable profile to attack the taller poppy.All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
If you are saying that old fat ugly bitches with brains should not be critical of young pretty women who have a position in life that every young girl dreams of (being a princess married to their prince charming) then I don't agree. I think she should be allowed to be critical so everyone can see what a lonely, ugly person and how green with envy she reall is. She is makign the news by attacking a very tall poppy knowing what backlash will come. She is flogging a book. It's on the front pages here. Well done... free media publicity... a coup.
She has something to sell and this is a way to get the free atention she needs to have the money for those chocolates.
Always remember what you post, send or do on the internet is not private and you are responsible.
- Rorschach
- Posts: 14801
- Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2012 5:25 pm
Re: What a bitch?
Oh be sure that I have unlike yourself on almost every topic.Aussie wrote:Good to see that you get your priorities right.Rorschach wrote:I'm just wondering if your latest choices of topic titles are deliberate attempts to make the site look bad Aussie?![]()
Surely not...
"What a bitch"
"Pissy"
etc...
Your topics do not inform or invite the titles are usually hopeless if not offensive.
Care to answer the question?
For a change

DOLT - A person who is stupid and entirely tedious at the same time, like bwian. Oblivious to their own mental incapacity. On IGNORE - Warrior, mellie, Nom De Plume, FLEKTARD
Re: What a bitch?
It took you all that to say what I had already said.....and it was hardly obtuse.....or playing a man and not the ball, any more than that fat ugly bitch did.Super Nova wrote:Arhhh now I see. I ignored the man to play the ball.Aussie wrote:Yes, I am sure Kate is doing her job. But, my point was a tad different. If I was a fat bitch life loser like her, the last person I'd be critical of would be someone who obviously has regard for their physical well-being and appearance......unless of course I was also an attention seeking fat bitch life loser using their miserable profile to attack the taller poppy.All over the news as you would expect here in the UK.
I don't think this is the case. They clearly love each other and she is smart enough to avoid the trap Diana fell into. She has been brought up to be a women of stature and has for a long time moved in elite circles. It follows that she knows when to be quite. The quiter she is the better. She makes no mistakes so they need something to have a go at her over. Finding little this bitch picks on this.
It shows Kate is doing her role well. In any marrage the women has to carry the burden of breeding... that's just how life has dished out the roles. She is basically critising Kate for being a women and understanding her role and managing her image for the sake of the Royal Family enterprise.
If you are saying that old fat ugly bitches with brains should not be critical of young pretty women who have a position in life that every young girl dreams of (being a princess married to their prince charming) then I don't agree. I think she should be allowed to be critical so everyone can see what a lonely, ugly person and how green with envy she reall is. She is makign the news by attacking a very tall poppy knowing what backlash will come. She is flogging a book. It's on the front pages here. Well done... free media publicity... a coup.
She has something to sell and this is a way to get the free atention she needs to have the money for those chocolates.
You are really crap at this.

Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 14 guests