Kill the poor

[IQS.RLOW]

http://www.menzieshouse.com.au/2013/04/ ... -poor.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;

Kill the poor.

In contrast to the fabulously rich, the enormously poor make little useful contribution to society. They consume more than they contribute, putting tremendous strain on the national budget.

A modest cull would strike at the root of our fiscal dilemma. If the least productive 20% of citizens were decommissioned it would directly release a recurrent $25bn, which would almost cover overspending by the Gillard Government between now and September 14th, assuming Mr Swan maintains his long-term average rate of profligacy.

But there are other benefits. Innovative industries would spring up, creating exciting new jobs in processing camps, traffic would move faster unhampered by windscreen cleaners, streets would be cleared of pavement artists and beggars while homeless shelters in our better suburbs could be turned into agreeable gastro pubs, cafes and wine bars. Think of the inner city investment opportunities.

Were 30% of our poorest eliminated we’d become a new tiger of Asia. This bold initiative would rid us of indolent students; hapless single mums, lower order drug dealers, social workers, performance artists, Greenpeace supporters and the remaining processing personnel in our collapsing yet heavily subsidised manufacturing industries.

Hospital waiting lists would plunge, reality television would evaporate due to shabby ratings and social benefits could be distributed as a short term safety net only, with six weeks dependency triggering automatic termination in the broadest possible sense.

With an audacious and admittedly politically complex stretch target of expunging the underperforming 50% of Australians, the country would become the Switzerland of the South. Our tax rate could drop to 13%, we’d evolve into the regional financial centre successive Governments have aspired to become and there would be no need for any tax on superannuation whatsoever.

The policy would be environmentally sound. The remains of the fiscally challenged could be recycled in a more useful way, perhaps as premium pet food, or blood and bone to speed growth in new National Parks reclaimed from redundant suburbs such as Rooty Hill.

[boxy]

Sounds fair enough, as long as this "non-contributory" clause is also extended to those whose only contribution is to "invest" without working or organising anything themselves. After all, if all they contribute is their cash, well, that cash is still going to be there for investing, with or without them.

Excellent idea. You either work, or you retire from life

[mellie]

Sounds fair enough, as long as this "non-contributory" clause is also extended to those whose only contribution is to "invest" without working or organising anything themselves. After all, if all they contribute is their cash, well, that cash is still going to be there for investing, with or without them.

Excellent idea. You either work, or you retire from life

You communist mong, even investors in the business of wealth creation and making their money work for them create jobs for others, this and provide accommodation for others also.


Not that you would know much about the word 'Job" boxy.


Other than the word "blow" being added to it this is.




Alas...many tiers of society are required boxy and IQ's... .... though our "new Labor fascists" might beg to differ when they argue only two classes are worthy of forming a sustainable society.

The elite, and the proletarian class. "Proles".

[Outlaw Yogi]

Kill the poor

Wasn't there a Goodies episode about culling the poor?

[Rorschach]

Was that the one with the plague of Rolf Harris's?

[boxy]

Sounds fair enough, as long as this "non-contributory" clause is also extended to those whose only contribution is to "invest" without working or organising anything themselves. After all, if all they contribute is their cash, well, that cash is still going to be there for investing, with or without them.

Excellent idea. You either work, or you retire from life

You communist mong, even investors in the business of wealth creation and making their money work for them create jobs for others, this and provide accommodation for others also.

Either they work themselves, or they're gone. Sorry, no in between. They don't get a pass just because their money does the work for them, 'cause we can just kill them all, and take their monies... and be far better off