Global Warming

[Rorschach]

Ok 1 more try...

According to the latest data from mankind’s best and latest instruments, from impeccable sources, the climate models are doing poorly.

The first IPCC report in 1990 predicted air temperatures would increase by 0.30°C per decade, and by 0.20°C to 0.50°C per decade at the outside. But according to NASA satellites that measure almost the entire planet 24/7, the trend since then has been 0.17°C per decade at most. The climate scientists ignore these awkward results and instead only quote temperatures from land thermometers, half of which are at airports where they are artificially warmed by jet engines and hot tarmac, and most of the rest are in warming micro-climates like near air conditioner outlets, at sewage plants, or in car parks. Obviously the data from these corrupted thermometers should not be used.

Ocean temperatures have only been measured properly since 2003 when the Argo program became operational. 3,000 Argo buoys roam the oceans, precisely measuring temperatures on each 10-day dive into the depths. Before Argo we used sporadic sampling with buckets and diving darts along a few commercial shipping lanes, but these measurements have such massively high uncertainties as to be useless – given that the expected ocean warming is measured in hundredths of a degree. Since Argo started the ocean temperatures have been flat, no warming at all.

The assumed temperature amplification due to changes in humidity and clouds exhibits itself in all the models as prominent warming about 10km up over the tropics. We have been measuring the atmospheric warming pattern since the 1960s using weather balloons, released twice a day from 900 locations around the planet, many millions of them in total, and no such “hotspot” has been detected. This is direct observational proof that the amplification is missing.

The climate models predict that the outgoing radiation from the earth decreases in the weeks following a rise in the surface temperature, due to aggressive heat-trapping by extra humidity. But analysis of the outgoing radiation measured by NASA satellites for the last two decades shows the opposite occurs: the earth gives off more heat after the surface temperature rises. Again, this suggests that the amplification assumed in the models simply does not occur in reality.

Government climate scientists tend to excuse away these failings, often blaming unmeasured aerosols whose effects are only dimly understood. These excuses wear ever thinner as the CO2 level continues to rise but the temperature plateau of the last 12 years persists.

There are huge vested interests in the theory of manmade climate change. They will soon have to face up to the fact that they have been unwittingly relying on assumed amplification by humidity for most of the predicted temperature increases, and that the amplification is not there in reality.

http://joannenova.com.au/2012/08/david- ... are-wrong/

[skippy]

According to the latest data from mankind’s best and latest instruments, from impeccable sources, the climate models are doing poorly.

Oh well who can argue with such concrete evidence as a story printed in a climate science denialists rag that quotes impeccable sources as it's evidence. Game over hey.

[5.56 NATO]

In the next few years when the western countries are being torn to shreds by the Muslims within we will realise the real threat and forget all about AGW......or we could be smart and deal with em now.

[Rorschach]

According to the latest data from mankind’s best and latest instruments, from impeccable sources, the climate models are doing poorly.

Oh well who can argue with such concrete evidence as a story printed in a climate science denialists rag that quotes impeccable sources as it's evidence. Game over hey.

Yes.... who can argue the facts... not you eh Skip.
Too easy dribbling and shooting messengers.. facts are facts buddy...
in case you've missed them over the years you can go back and start reading this topic again... you'll come across the FACT that the models are failures and warming has... hmmm.. how did the IPCC phrase it... "stalled" "paused"
hey if you don't want to believe me listen to them, after all they can't get everything wrong now can they.

[IQS.RLOW]

According to the latest data from mankind’s best and latest instruments, from impeccable sources, the climate models are doing poorly.

Oh well who can argue with such concrete evidence as a story printed in a climate science denialists rag that quotes impeccable sources as it's evidence. Game over hey.

Dear Skippy

Shut the fuck up, you green warmy toe rag. Address the message, don't attack the messenger. There's a good girl.

Luv
IQ

[skippy]

According to the latest data from mankind’s best and latest instruments, from impeccable sources, the climate models are doing poorly.

Oh well who can argue with such concrete evidence as a story printed in a climate science denialists rag that quotes impeccable sources as it's evidence. Game over hey.

Dear Skippy

Shut the fuck up, you green warmy toe rag. Address the message, don't attack the messenger. There's a good girl.

Luv
IQ

Dear IQ
the message is flawed, it has no substance and no verifiable proof . Someone could say you were an impeccable source.

Love skippy.

[Rorschach]

Well, I guess that's Skippy's way to apologise and say he can't really be bothered with facts or the truth.

[IQS.RLOW]

Yes, skippy the resident forum gimp is pulling his "Ozpol defence"

Drop in on a debate, spew a typical lefty load of shit that makes no sense and offers sweet fuck all, throw in a couple of "LOLz", then disappear again.

No comment on where your 16 years of warmy bullshit has gone? Are you holding in all in your skull?

[Rorschach]

Al Gore...Climate Change Profit

[Super Nova]