https://www.jihadwatch.org/2019/08/non- ... n-of-peace
Delusional…. Justice Peter Johnson has certainly not spent 10 years studying the voluminous Islamic literature of Koran, Sira, hadiths, tafsirs (canonical commentaries), manuals of Sharia law and Islamic history, and yet, preposterously, he presents himself as a spontaneous authority.
A judge should comment on things that he knows to be certain on the basis of having studied THE EVIDENCE. Justice Johnson is certainly not an expert on jihad.
Al-Ghazzali is an acknowledged authority.
Imam al-Ghazzali (d. 1111), Islamic intellectual and revivalist of Islam, who is considered the second-greatest Muslim after Prophet Muhammad, wrote this on JIHAD:
“One must go on Jihad at least once a year… One may use a catapult against them when they are in a fortress, even if among them are women and children. One may set fire on them and/or drown them… One may cut down their trees… One must destroy their useless book [Bible, Torah etc.]. Jihadists may take as booty whatever they decide…”
How can a judge sit there and tell the accused that islam is the religion of peace and that the accused has got it all wrong....
Delusional...bordering on incompetent.....
To discover those who rule over you, first discover those who you cannot criticize...Voltaire
Its coming...the rest of the world versus islam....or is it here already...