Communist Greens want to steal private land

[Bobby]

Communism is here - right now:

https://www.noticer.news/south-australi ... land-bill/

June 8th  2025.

Fury has erupted after a controversial Greens bill
that allows the government to seize private land
without consent or compensation in order to “ease the housing crisis” passed the upper house in South Australia.

The Use of Vacant Land Bill made it through the Legislative Council with Labor support this week, and will now be considered in the House of Assembly, despite concerns over the unclear wording of the proposed legislation and warnings it is “poorly drafted” and a “fundamental breach of property rights”.

Pushed by the far-left Greens party, the bill amends the Planning, Development and Infrastructure Act 2016 to enable to government to take control over land if it determines the owner is unwilling or unable to develop or make use of it, and if it is “appropriate” that the land be used for a public purpose.

“Public purpose” is defined by the bill as use as a public park or for recreation or sport, use for public housing, or any other use declared by the Minister to be a public purpose.

No compensation is necessary under the bill,
and it only requires the government to take “reasonable steps” on “reasonable terms” while negotiating the acquisition of land, with no agreement from the owner needed.

“Fundamentally, the idea that the state can take private property rights without compensation or consent is an affront to everything that we have as our legal system,” CEO Liam Golding told The Advertiser.

“The bill is just poorly drafted … there are no checks and balances. It’s utterly subjective and from a legal perspective there’s nothing stopping the government from saying that a week is long enough for development to have progressed. There’s also no definition of what underdeveloped land means.”

Australians also objected to the bill on social media, with conservative commentator Fred Pawle saying on X: “Australia is hurtling towards communism.”

[Bobby]

I've been warning you all for many years -

first they start out with cultural Marxism and
now it's elevated to full blown Marxism on the agenda.

New land taxes are also a way that you pay rent to use your own land -
pure communism.

[Bobby]

Are the Greens a 5th column of communist infiltrators?

[tllwd]

Are the Greens a 5th column of communist infiltrators?

Green on outside, red on inside riddle?

[Bobby]

Are the Greens a 5th column of communist infiltrators?

Green on outside, red on inside riddle?

Commies and they are gunna take everything from us -

they already brought in new land taxes so we have to rent our own land.

[Black Orchid]

It won't pass but I'll never understand why the Greens nowadays get the votes that they do. They're fiscal and social morons.

[Bobby]

It won't pass but I'll never understand why the Greens nowadays get the votes that they do. They're fiscal and social morons.

Castro and Stalin would be proud.

Instead of a communist revolution as per Cuba - and Castro -

we are being swallowed by it one small piece at a time.

[Aquarius]

It won't pass but I'll never understand why the Greens nowadays get the votes that they do. They're fiscal and social morons.

Same here - who votes for these loonies? Although it's good to see a few of them got the boot - along with that despicable leader of theirs. But they're still in the Upper House unfortunately.

I could also ask who votes for the Teals? Not me - but Zali Steggall keeps getting re-elected for some reason. Although we still have a NSW Liberal Member for Manly - James Griffen. My neighbour's son works in his office and looks like having a future in politics.

[mellie]

The express purpose of handing land back to our Indigenous "elders" was so they The Left ( commies) & Malcolm Turnbulls + Julia Bishop's aka traitors could take possession of it themselves via others cloaked in " Conservationist " garb.
This was always the underlying agenda behind "the voice" project.
It should have been more transparent and openly explained how The Voice referendum was never really about truth telling, rather was about stealing land all over again, only with a false air of legitimacy this time as Labor & Green installed the elders they knew would be complicit in their actions, would do as they wished.

The average Indigenous/ Non Indigenous Australian would assume that they ( Greens + Labor) were breaking fair deals with trusted Indigenous elders, when the truth is, these elders were purposely installed to make the transfer of land very simple.

The community themselves end up being exploited all over again.

The land that's been set-aside needs to be kept safe by and for Indigenous communities who are suffering as we speak.
BUT NEVER SOLD OFF!!!

ESPECIALLY TO FOREIGN INVESTORS IE CHINA OR RUSSIA AS THE LEFT HAD PLANNED.

I saw this coming as soon as the "Left" came out with the bogus Voice referendum.
This government's disgusting, in one breath they're saying sorry, with another they're doing it all over again, exploiting our Indigenous people all over again.

Many of the Indigenous people in Ballarat were "pro -voice" referendum, untill my eldest daughter and her father who himself is an elder warned their mob before they cast their votes.

Our government has no shame, despite all this truth telling and yarning, talking to eachother ( both sides) black and white, paying respects to traditional owners sorry etc...... it's all a diversion from what they really want to do with Indigenous land, and crown land.

They've exploited as much as they can to date, now the government, more so the enemies of our nation want to exploit Indigenous all over again.

[mellie]

It needs to be done properly, fairly, and with guard rails in place to prevent individuals from profiteering and taking advantage of their own communities and or being duped themselves.

The government didn't want guard rails , rather wanted elders to accept offers that would hurt their own communities in the long run.

This isn't how a treaty or referendum should look, we need a reviews tribunal, and those who genuinely care for country to pick-over the referendum and explain exactly what the outcomes of accepting it could mean for Indigenous Australians.

First and foremost, Australian politicians need to know it's stollen land their trying to bargain and bribe Indigenous peoples with to begin with.

How dare they!

It's like stealing someone's house, and then given them a tiny payment to re- sell their house back to another party who will then sell it for 500 times what they gave you for it.

The Indigenous elder would be given a chance of home ownership in exchange for selling his peoples country out from under them. To investors.

Many Indigenous communities are deliberately being deprived, are in desperate need of a community hall, school arts centre, a school bus, school/community nurse practitioner, the list is endless, and I can see how even well-meaning Indigenous community elders could be coerced into allowing a foreign Investor a 99 year lease to develop, mine, their land, if they could recieve enough money to improve their lives today

But here's the thing, this government should already be providing them with these humble necessities of life, on account of them already having stollen most of their country.


Indigenous Australians should have Gold pensions Gold Medicare cards and FREE access to any school in the country at the tax payers expense, boarding schools, university fees, decent housing and well equipped community facilities already.

Why should they be forced to agree to terms set by the thieves themselves inorder to have the basic standard of living most white trash , meth-heads, criminals who have arrived illegitimately get handed on a silver spoon?

Why are our Indigenous Australians still singing for the very supper that rightfully belongs to them?

And why should they be expected to agree to some dodgy contract ( The Voice referendum) in order to have what they rightfully own to begin with?

How do our politicians sleep at night?

Liberals had the marvellous opportunity to go through this referendum and detail Albanese's & Greens + Labor et al's exploitive agenda in dot point, but did they?

No, because whilst Labor is their political opponent, they all stood to gain from screwing the black-fellas over yet again if Labor had managed to get it passed.

The Voice referendum was the biggest scam that stood to exploit vulnerable Australian Indigenous people in history.

Since Europeans first arrived.

Now China along with a conga-line of multinationals want to take a piece of the pie to secure many more generations of self- entitled and self- declared "elitists " to come.

The deal would perhaps give native title holders the ability to help their communities over the short term, but they would be back to where they started within a generation, worse, they'd have absolutely nothing to bargain with in the future.

Imagine being that Indigenous elder sitting around the camp fire explaining how white man tricked him into giving what little land they had left over in exchange for a $20 Kmart voucher or a spontaneous game of poker?

This is why Labor tried to rush it through, because they couldn't take the chance of too many people figuring out their agenda and then calling them out on it.

Other politicians should be raising the failed Voice referendum in parliament, it warrants a federal enquiry and its agenda to be made transparent at the very least but you could hear a pin drop in parliament, not even Labors own are keen to discuss their own botched referendums agenda which cost us 40 Million?




Why is this do you suppose?

Why were Labor heavy on promoting this product madly, yet so lite on details . .. and seemingly aren't comfortable discussing it now?
At the very least, it could be used as a learning opportunity, to learn where they went so terribly wrong.

No, because they have an agenda to re- badge it and introduce it slowly, under your very noses. Aka state- gov treaty's!

They promoted it as giving Indigenous Australians a voice to parliament, but didn't want to explain how it would deliver Indigenous Australians a Voice , but you see, there was the fine print, always read the fine print and if something seems too good to be true, then it probably isn't good at all. Particularly where a government is trying to race through policy is concerned.

Of course they didn't want to discuss the fine print because if people knew what was at stake, they wouldn't vote for it and Labor knew this, and also knew that they would lose the next election should they have made it an election box tick option.
Because by then, we'd understand it better and realise the consequences of rushed policies.

He couldn't have that, didn't want his referendum skid-mark on his suit at the 2025 election.