Guidelines for posting

[Senexx]

And now the initial post is up for criticism and review so it is covered under fair dealing anyway.

[Hebe]

Let's keep the posting and electing rules separate. At least one of them is clear.

[Rainbow Moonlight]

That actually makes sense Hebe, but it woudl be nice to have a set of rules as clear as the guidelines are for the dismissing and electing od mods and admins and voting.

[freediver]

I have left people the option of altering the constitution. So far no-one has taken it up. If you can't come up with something better, don;t complain about my version.

[Senexx]

For a political animal forum there does seem to be a lot of apathy.

[Aussie]

I have left people the option of altering the constitution. So far no-one has taken it up. If you can't come up with something better, don;t complain about my version.

.....and if they don't, will you just assume they 'all' want your convoluted crap?

freeloader, it is an impossible task. What you wrote really is garbage. Trying to edit/amend such a thing will just worsen the mess it already is.

[freediver]

.....and if they don't, will you just assume they 'all' want your convoluted crap?

Obviously not Aussie.

What you wrote really is garbage.

So now you are admitting you don't understand it? Does this mean you will stop telling everyone what it 'means'?

[Aussie]

So now you are admitting you don't understand it? Does this mean you will stop telling everyone what it 'means'?

Oh dear. The Skunk is drunk...................again.

[Jovial Monk]

Item 6 of boxhead’s posting guidelines seems to have been abandoned from the get-go.

[HIGHERBEAM]

I would prefer rules for electing and dismissing admins and moderators be added to our PA guideleines than that we adopt your constitution freediver.

At last someone who can see the daylight