Conroy sucks Packers cock

Australian Federal, State and Local Politics
Forum rules
Don't poop in these threads. This isn't Europe, okay? There are rules here!
Post Reply
User avatar
IQSRLOW
Posts: 1514
Joined: Wed May 07, 2008 9:26 pm

Conroy sucks Packers cock

Post by IQSRLOW » Mon Oct 25, 2010 12:48 am

Minister Conroy lauds Packer's raid on Ten
http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/natio ... 5942998719

Why wouldn't Packer decide to get back into FTA TV when Liebor are handing back a quarter of a million dollars to the FTA TV stations.

Crikey would be hysterical over this if it involved the coalition....but let me guess. They won't raise a whimper just like they did when $250M was handed back to the FTA stations :roll:

And this govt has the hide to accuse The Australian of bias while they are busy sucking Crikey off under the desk

skippy.

Re: Conroy sucks Packers cock

Post by skippy. » Mon Oct 25, 2010 9:16 am

It looks like spermy is jealous again. :D

User avatar
TomB
Posts: 615
Joined: Wed Nov 26, 2008 11:04 pm

Re: Conroy sucks Packers cock

Post by TomB » Mon Oct 25, 2010 10:16 pm

IQSRLOW wrote:...... handing back a quarter of a million dollars to the FTA TV stations.

Packer probably wipes his arse with $250K every day.
You vote, you lose!

User avatar
boxy
Posts: 6748
Joined: Sat Dec 15, 2007 11:59 pm

Re: Conroy sucks Packers cock

Post by boxy » Mon Oct 25, 2010 11:02 pm

Didn't he make about 10 mill in the first few days off the share price increase?
"But you will run your fluffy bunny mouth at me. And I will take it, to play poker."

WaB

Re: Conroy sucks Packers cock

Post by WaB » Tue Oct 26, 2010 9:55 pm

I fail to see how this is any Government sucking Packer's cock. More likely, Packer is taking up a fallback position.

It all revolves around the sports anti-siphonning list. Some sports cannot be shown exclusively on pay-tv or the digital multi-channels, they must be shown on analogue free-to-air TV. With analogue FTA starting to be phased out, a review of the ASL is obviously due. With this review Packer is obviously hoping that he will get more things available to be shown on pay-TV, that is preferred option. But if (as seems likely) the government keeps pretty much the same list but counts FTA digital multi-channels the same as analogue FTA then it will be a huge boost for them, at the expense of pay-TV. Packer is just positioning himself for option B if his preferred option doesn't happen.

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests